Reconstruction and Backlash – The Black Codes

Unit

Reconstruction and Backlash – The Black Codes

Years: 1865-1877

Culture & Community

Economy & Society

Freedom & Equal Rights

Historical Events, Movements, and Figures

01

Prior Knowledge

Prior to this lesson, students should be familiar with the precipitating events that led to the Civil War along with the intra-party divisions among moderate and “Radical” Republican politicians regarding the future of African Americans’ civil rights. Students should also understand the pre-war role of enslaved people’s labor in the U.S. economy, both regionally in the South and also as it related to Northern manufacturing and industry and global markets. The debate regarding the balance of congressional power between “slave” and “free” states should also be understood, set off as it was by the westward expansion of the United States across North America. This is significant for students’ understanding of the questions regarding Congressional representation between states. Lastly, students should understand that the Union and the Republican party did not have a consensus regarding the post-war status of freedpeople and that it was not evidently understood that formerly enslaved people would assume full citizenship rights.

You may want to consider after teaching this lesson: The Freedman’s Bureau Voting & Representation

02

Student Objectives

  • Examine and discuss the Johnson Administration’s approach to Reconstruction after the Civil War 
  • Analyze and compare Black Codes and their implications for the rights and legal status of freedpeople in the immediate aftermath of the Civil War in former Confederate states 
  • Evaluate a range of responses to Black Codes and the ways these laws were catalysts for debating the future legal status of formerly enslaved people
Show more

03

Organizing Idea

President Andrew Johnson’s approach towards reconstructing the Union and the uncertainty around freedpeople’s legal status enabled former Confederate states to pass laws, known as the Black Codes, which attempted to legally codify freedpeople’s subservient status in Southern states. The Black Codes were one of the key catalysts for Republican-led action in Congress that enshrined freedpeople’s status as U.S. citizens with equal protection under the law.

Show more

04

Teacher Context

President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on April 15, 1865 only six days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered during the Civil War. Andrew Johnson, Lincoln’s vice president, thus became president of the United States at a pivotal moment in reconstructing the Union. His choice as the vice president was an intentional one. When Republican President Abraham Lincoln ran for reelection in 1864, he chose the Tennessee-born Democrat, Andrew Johnson, to serve as his Vice President. While Tennessee had seceded and joined the Confederacy, Johnson remained loyal to the Union.

In this post-war context of governance, the legal status of freedpeople was an open question. The Thirteenth Amendment ended slavery and freed formerly enslaved people but did not go so far as to grant citizenship rights, such as the right to vote.

Surprising the nation, President Johnson instead of supporting Congress in efforts to codify these rights, instead allowed for lenient treatment of former Confederate states in his approach to Reconstruction. Johnson ignored and vetoed Congress as he promoted his own governing policies to reconstruct the Union, arguing that “White men alone must manage the South.”. Johnson allowed former Confederate states to return to the Union once they wrote new state constitutions that ratified the Thirteenth Amendment–abolishing slavery–and denouncing secession. Johnson also granted amnesty to former Confederate officials, if they took an oath of loyalty to the Union and accepted the end of slavery. He also allowed opportunities for both high ranking Confederates and large plantation owners and former enslavers to apply for pardons. 

Further limiting the rights of African Americans, Johnson only allowed people who were eligible to vote before the Civil War to vote on new state constitutions. This meant that freed African Americans could not participate, once again concentrating power in the hands of White Southerners who defended slavery and secession. Therefore when the southern states held elections throughout the summer of 1865 the new state governments were dominated by White Southerners and what was meant to be a time for political reform in formerly Confederate Southern states, did not benefit the civil rights of African American people.

Southern state legislatures filled this legal void with their own legislation, known collectively as Black Codes. These laws began to be passed in 1868. The laws differed across states but offered a combination of minimal citizenship rights while also asserting the dominance of Southern state legislatures over African American people. Across the ideological spectrum in the North, there was opposition to these Black Codes even though many Northern states continued denying African American people the right to vote, serve in juries, or marry non-Black citizens. To many Northerners, Black Codes were an attempt to use the legislative power granted under Johnson’s Presidential Reconstruction to reinstitute a condition that closely resembled slavery and defied the outcome of the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation.

The Black Codes were met with resistance from Republicans, the Freedmen’s Bureau and even the Army. Despite President’s Johnson’s opposition, eventually the Republican-controlled Congress was able to pass the Military Reconstruction Acts of 1867. The acts were intended to formally reorganize the Southern states that had seceded from the Union and to establish conditions for their readmission into the United States. Under these acts, the former Confederate states (except for Tennessee) were to be taken out of the Union and placed under the temporary rule of military governors. The Acts therefore allowed for the creation of a new constitution that provided for universal male suffrage, the ratification of the 14th Amendment, which granted citizenship rights and equal protection under the law to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, including former slaves and military oversight, intended to protect African American rights and prevent resistance from white supremacist groups. By 1868, the Black Codes were no longer existent as Republicans in Congress used the Military Reconstruction Acts to take away power from Southern state legislatures. 

Despite their brief legal status, Black Codes served as evidence of the Southern states ongoing attempts to minimize and deny rights to freedpeople by subordinating them to the status of laborers with little agency over their futures. The codes were therefore a catalyst for addressing the ambiguity around the citizenship status and civil rights of freedpeople. The Republican response to Black Codes marked the end of President Johnson’s vision of Reconstruction and ushered in an era of Congressional Reconstruction and federal policies with more emphasis on codifying the rights of freedpeople. This more assertive set of policies led to the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment which granted citizenship rights and equal protection under the law to freedpeople.

References & Further Resources

Video: Presidential Reconstruction, NBC News Learn.

Video: Black Codes, NBC News Learn.

Video: The Thirteenth Amendment and Black Codes, Center for Civic Education.

Video and Lesson Plans: The Black Codes, PBS LearningMedia. 

Video, Interactive Timeline, and Teaching Resources: Slavery by Another Name, PBS.

Show more

05

Teacher Tips

This lesson begins by examining political compromises made by the Johnson Administration for the sake of expediting the restoration of the Union after the Civil War, compromises that created space for former Confederate states to systematically restrict the rights of freedpeople despite the newfound illegality of chattel slavery. It continues by introducing the ratification of Black Codes in Southern states. These topics may raise questions with students about the existence of “unjust laws” and the role of government in perpetuating and codifying racist attitudes and structures.

Throughout the lesson, students will encounter examples of ways recently freed African Americans had their civil rights restricted through legislative means. They will also encounter the language used by those who justified the existence of Black Codes, based on racist attitudes. In many instances this is both racial slurs and racist language (ex. negro, mulatto). It is important that you approach the use of resources from a trauma- informed stance and give students a content warning before distributing the articles. We recommend having a conversation with students about the ways in which the language we use about race has changed and to clarify that students should be mindful with language that they use to discuss the past, when terms, such as negro or colored, differ from what is most appropriate to use today. Additionally, teaching students about the way laws have been used to enable racial inequality entails asking them to confront the way power and government may be misused in order to preserve a state of White supremacy. Successfully broaching such emotionally-charged content requires understanding your students, their intellectual and emotional needs, and engaging this history with empathy and care. 

Within the activities there are all sources that include racist language or images that need to be treated with sensitivity. These historical expressions of racism are included in order to help students recognize and understand the ongoing influence of White supremacist ideology after enslavement. However, it is imperative that these be shared with students with great care, as they can trigger painful emotions in students, such as anger, sadness, fear, and shame. African American students may feel that their identity is under attack. Moreover, if not examined critically, these sources can perpetuate anti-Black ideas. Use the guidelines below when sharing racist content with students.

  1. Create or revisit classroom expectations for behavior that are grounded in respect and empathy for all.
  2. Inform students before sharing any racist source materials. Offer a clear rationale for why you are sharing the source. Allow individual students to opt out of engaging with the source, and offer them a meaningful alternative activity. 
  3. Provide clear expectations for how students should engage with the racist content. For instance, students should never say the N-word out loud.
  4. Make space for students to reflect on their emotional reactions to seeing/reading racist content. Private journaling offers a safe way for students to reflect. This can be followed by a discussion, in which students can choose whether to share.  Be sure to validate students’ emotions. Sharing your own emotions can offer powerful modeling.
  5. Be explicit about the racist ideas included in the source. Be sure to identify images, ideas, or words as racist, analyze how they are being used and consider their impact. 
  6. Invite students to “talk back” to racist ideas. This includes coming up with counterexamples for stereotypes.
Show more

06

Student Context

When Republican President Abraham Lincoln ran for reelection in 1864 during the American Civil War, he chose the Tennessee-born Democrat, Andrew Johnson to serve as his Vice President. While Tennessee seceded and joined the Confederacy, Johnson remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln was assassinated on April 15, 1865 only six days after Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered, making Johnson president of the United States at a pivotal moment in reconstructing the Union. 

President Johnson surprised the nation with his approach to Reconstruction. Johnson was a defender of states’ rights and ignored Congress in favor of his own policies to reconstruct the Union. The Thirteenth Amendment had ended slavery and freed formerly enslaved people but did not go so far as to grant citizenship rights to these four million people. In this post-war context of a new presidential administration and tensions regarding the process of reconstructing a deeply divided country, the legal status of freedpeople was an open question. This legal void meant that there was an opportunity for former Confederate Southern states to determine the legal status of freedpeople. 

What emerged were laws, known as Black Codes. These pieces of legislature were passed by Southern state legislatures. The codes defined the legal status of freedpeople and determined the extent to which they had rights and responsibilities as citizens. These Black Codes became a source of national tension and controversy.

As different visions for Reconstruction emerged between President Johnson and Congress, Black Codes were at the center of political debates and motivated debate over the future legal status and rights afforded to freedpeople in a reconstructed United States.

Show more

07

Key Questions

01.

How did President Johnson approach Reconstruction and what did this mean for former Confederate states and freedpeople?

02.

What were Black Codes and what did they mean for the civil rights and quality of life for freedpeople in former Confederate states?

03.

What were the various responses to Black Codes and why did these responses matter in the context of post-Civil War Reconstruction?

08

Activities & Sources

Select the activities and sources you would like to include in the student view and click “Launch Student View.”

It is highly recommended that you review the Teaching Tips and sources before selecting the activities to best meet the needs and readiness of your students. Activities may utilize resources or primary sources that contain historical expressions of racism, outdated language or racial slurs.

Reading and Analysis of Johnson’s Proclamation of Amnesty 45 minutes


If not previously reviewed, have students read the first two paragraphs of the Student Context to develop content knowledge to engage in this activity.

As a class, read through Andrew Johnson’s 1865 “Proclamation of Amnesty and Pardon.” The proclamation language is dense and may prove challenging so begin by guiding students through the text, reading the first two paragraphs out loud. After each sentence, call on a volunteer to rephrase in their own words. Write the revised version on a dry erase board, smartboard, or chart paper so that students may have access to a more accessible and jointly written version.

Next, have students turn and talk to a partner, explaining their own understandings of the paragraph. Call on volunteers to share. Students should be able to explain that President Johnson was allowing some–but not all–former Confederates to return to the Union and have their property–except for formerly enslaved people–returned to them if they were willing to swear an oath to the Constitution and honor the emancipation of formerly enslaved people. Have students also discuss and reflect on the following questions:

“Why do you think President Johnson would grant amnesty and pardons to former Confederates?

What does that reveal about his goals for Reconstruction?

What do you think could be possible consequences of this action?”


Next, have students remain in conversation with a partner, assigning each pair one of the fourteen listed “classes of persons” who were declared ineligible for this pardon and amnesty along with the final two paragraphs of the proclamation, which state that even ineligible persons may apply for and receive clemency. Pairs should discuss the following question before sharing their thoughts to the whole class:

“Why do you think that President Johnson did not extend amnesty to this class of people?

What does Johnson’s willingness to offer clemency to this class of people imply about his approach to Reconstruction?”


Conclude this activity by engaging in an open discussion of President Johnson’s approach to Reconstruction.

As an additional extension you may opt to screen the first minute and thirty seconds of President Johnson’s Reconstruction Plan and have students engage in an open discussion of the film’s analysis of President Johnson’s approach to Reconstruction. Focus specifically on historian Eric Foner’s insistence that Johnson was “lenient” in his treatment of former Confederates. Ask students, “Why would Eric Foner consider President Johnson’s approach to Reconstruction lenient and why would leniency be seen as a problem?”

Jigsaw- Analysis of the Black Codes 60 minutes

If not previously reviewed, have students read the third paragraph of the Student Context to develop content knowledge to engage in this activity. Expand on that reading by further, explaining to the class that President Johnson’s lenient approach to Reconstruction allowed former Confederates leaders to reclaim power in Southern states and that the civil rights and citizenship status of formerly enslaved African Americans was unclear and legally unguaranteed at the end of the Civil War. This meant that state legislatures in Southern states were empowered to pass laws specifying the legal rights afforded to African American people, despite the fact that many of these lawmakers were former enslavers or sympathetic to the defense of chattel slavery. Tell students that these legislative acts are collectively referred to as Black Codes.

Divide the class into seven groups for a Jigsaw activity, with each group reading the Black Codes from one or two states and completing the Analysis of Black Codes Handout.

  • Mississippi
  • South Carolina
  • Texas
  • Florida and Tennessee
  • Alabama and North Carolina
  • Maryland and Virginia
  • Louisiana and Georgia

In the first round of the jigsaw activity, have each group answer the following questions:

  • List the rights that are explicitly named in the Black Code. What limitations to these rights exist, according to the Black Code?
  • In what ways does the Black Code deny or restrict rights to freedpeople?
  • Why would this law contribute to the racial discrimination ?

Once students have read and discussed, create new groupings in a jigsaw fashion so that each new grouping includes at least one student representing each of the original group configurations. Have students discuss the questions, “Why would former Confederate states pass these laws under President Johnson’s Reconstruction? What would these laws mean for the future opportunities and social standing of freedpeople in the South?”

Finally, recognizing the emotional impact of this activity you may also opt to allow time for students to share their personal reflections on the Black Code that they read, focusing on their intuitive reaction and how they would respond or “talk back” to the ethical and legal implications to those drafting the codes.

Discussion-Responses to the Black Codes 45 minutes

Share with the class that Black Codes elicited a range of reactions from different segments of American society. Divide the class into groups of two assigning each student the responses from a Northerner and two Southern African Americans.

Have each group answer and discuss the following questions in conversation using the Response to the Black Codes handout:

  • What stance does the author of this excerpt take regarding Black Codes? What evidence is there of this stance?
  • What does this response to Black Codes reveal about the political and racial worldview of the author(s)?
  • What is one sentence that stands out to you from this excerpt? In what way is it powerful and revealing of the attitudes and emotions of the United States in the after the Civil War?

As an optional element, you may opt to review as a whole class or divide students into groups of three and add the response to the Black Codes from a Confederate to the discussion. This excerpt, by George Fitzhugh, includes racist language and stereotypes that need to be treated with sensitivity. While this historical expression of racism is included in order to help students recognize and understand the ongoing influence of White supremacist ideology after enslavement, it is imperative that if shared it is done with care as it may trigger painful emotions and responses in students.

The Art of Community – African American Daily Life 60 minutes

Begin this activity by engaging in a brief discussion with students. Ask students to brainstorm and share how during difficult times in their lives they have been able to resist or push through on their own or through the support of their family, friends or community members.

Make a connection for students between their responses and some of the ways that many African Americans had to determine how to resist or push through while the Black Codes were in place keeping in mind their own safety as well as that of their family, friends and community members. Responses may include:

  • Organized responses-Conventions, Meetings
  • Outreach-Publications or Speeches
  • Civic Participation (when able)- voting, political participation
  • Community Connection & Pride-Church, the Arts

Introduce students to artist Henry Ossawa Tanner, born in 1859, who was able to use his Art to positively represent the African American community. Provide an overview of Tanner using a resource of your choosing or by reading aloud the following brief overview:

Henry Ossawa Tanner was an influential African American artist known for his paintings and contributions to American art history. Born on June 21, 1859, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Tanner showed early talent in art and pursued his passion despite facing racial barriers. Tanner’s artistic journey took him to Philadelphia and later to Paris, France, where he studied at renowned art schools. His time in Europe allowed him to develop his unique style, often focusing on religious and everyday scenes with a profound sense of light and atmosphere. Although Tanner eventually lived outside of the United States and largely completed his series on African American daily life in the late 1890s his experiences growing up through the end of the Civil War, the Black Codes and the later Jim Crow laws gave him a unique insight into the challenges facing African Americans on a daily basis. Henry Ossawa Tanner’s legacy extends beyond his artistry and his images provide a contrast to the negative depictions of African Americans and create a sense of cultural pride in the African American community. Throughout his career, Tanner broke barriers as one of the first African American artists to achieve widespread success and his works continue to be celebrated for their emotional depth, technical skill, and spiritual themes.

As a whole group or in smaller groups sharing share two images by artist Henry Ossawa Tanner:

  • The Thankful Poor
  • The Banjo Lesson

Ask students to think, pair and share responses to the following prompts:

  • Who and what do you see in this painting? 
  • How are the people depicted? 
  • How does the depiction align or contrast with the societal views of African Americans between 1865-1900?
  • What emotions or reactions may the artist have intended to evoke from viewers with these representations of daily life?
  • In what ways could this painting be considered an act of resistance? How might people resist in similar ways in the present day?

Performance Task: Essay – Responding to Black Codes Then and Now

If students have completed Activity 2 they may use their completed Analysis of Black Codes Handout as a starting point for this essay. If they have not yet completed Activity 2, they should begin by choosing a state and Black Code excerpt to complete the handout from the selection provided. 

After completing the handout students should do additional independent reflection and research in order to complete an essay that incorporates responses to the following questions.

  • List the rights that are explicitly named in the Black Code. What limitations to these rights exist, according to the Black Code?
  • In what ways does the Black Code deny or restrict rights to freedpeople?
  • What kinds of assumptions – perhaps about the nature of African Americans – are built into the law? Why would this law therefore contribute to the racial discrimination, despite the emancipation of formerly enslaved people?
  • How might this law have acted to constrain and control freedpeople at that time. Imagine how the law might have worked in practice. What kinds of actual, real-life circumstances might the lawmakers have been trying to address?  
  • What are the implications of this law in the present day?  What are some ways you can push back or respond to these implications?

Please login or sign up to access the student view functions.